Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
Team
Memphis Grizzlies
Pos
G
No.
3
HT
6-5
WT
204
Age
33
(Feb 18, 1993)
College
Georgia
Draft
2013 (R1 P8)
Season Snapshot
2025
8.4
2.5
2.7
53%
With Teammate
0 Mins
Without Teammate
0 Mins
Most Impactful Pairings
Caldwell-Pope
Caldwell-Pope
Stat Impact
Core
Shooting
Defense & Discipline
Scoring Counts
Assisted vs Unassisted
Shot Diet & Point Mix
Playmaking
Touches & Passing Volume
Shot Quality
Defensive Playmaking
Contests
Matchups
Defense by Distance
Rebounding
Hustle Plays
Movement
Compare this player
Stat basis
Player season
Compare season
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Search for a player above to begin.
Share this chart with anyone who needs to lose an argument.
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Pick a comparison player to generate the biased list.
Polls
Log in to vote.
No active polls right now.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to start the discussion.
Loading more…
Page 1 / 1
Saved.
Financial Summary: Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
TOTAL VALUE
$43.2M
AVG. ANNUAL (AAV)
$21.6M
| Season | Team | Base Salary | Cap Hit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | MEM | $21,621,500 | $21,621,500 |
| 2026-27 | MEM | $21,621,500 | $21,621,500 |
| 2027-28 | MEM | UFA | |
All Lineup Combinations
Career Statistics
| Season | Team | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 |
|
82 | 31.5 | 12.7 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 4.8 | 11.9 | 40.1% | 1.9 | 5.4 | 34.5% | 1.3 | 1.9 | 69.6% | 50.1% | — |
| 2015 |
|
76 | 36.7 | 14.5 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 5.3 | 12.6 | 42.0% | 1.5 | 4.9 | 30.9% | 2.4 | 3.0 | 81.1% | 52.1% | — |
| 2016 |
|
76 | 33.3 | 13.8 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 4.9 | 12.2 | 39.9% | 2.0 | 5.8 | 35.0% | 2.0 | 2.4 | 83.2% | 51.9% | — |
| 2017 |
LAL
|
74 | 33.2 | 13.4 | 5.2 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 4.6 | 10.8 | 42.6% | 2.1 | 5.6 | 38.3% | 2.1 | 2.6 | 78.9% | 56.1% | — |
| 2018 |
LAL
|
82 | 24.8 | 11.4 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 4.0 | 9.2 | 43.0% | 1.8 | 5.3 | 34.7% | 1.7 | 1.9 | 86.7% | 56.8% | — |
| 2019 |
LAL
|
69 | 25.5 | 9.3 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 3.4 | 7.3 | 46.7% | 1.3 | 3.5 | 38.5% | 1.1 | 1.5 | 77.5% | 58.4% | — |
| 2020 |
LAL
|
67 | 28.4 | 9.8 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 3.3 | 7.6 | 43.1% | 1.8 | 4.4 | 41.0% | 1.4 | 1.7 | 86.6% | 58.8% | — |
| 2021 |
WAS
|
77 | 30.2 | 13.2 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 4.7 | 10.8 | 43.5% | 2.1 | 5.3 | 39.0% | 1.8 | 2.0 | 89.0% | 56.8% | — |
| 2022 |
|
76 | 31.4 | 10.8 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 3.8 | 8.3 | 46.2% | 1.8 | 4.2 | 42.3% | 1.4 | 1.6 | 82.4% | 59.8% | — |
| 2023 |
|
76 | 31.6 | 10.1 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.6 | 7.7 | 46.0% | 1.6 | 4.1 | 40.6% | 1.3 | 1.5 | 89.4% | 60.2% | — |
| 2024 |
|
78 | 29.5 | 8.7 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 3.1 | 7.1 | 43.5% | 1.5 | 4.3 | 33.8% | 1.1 | 1.2 | 86.6% | 57.0% | — |
| 2025 |
MEM
|
51 | 21.2 | 8.4 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 2.9 | 7.2 | 41.0% | 1.1 | 3.4 | 31.6% | 1.4 | 1.6 | 91.3% | 53.3% | — |
🧊 Playoffs? Never heard of ’emThis player hasn’t made the postseason yet. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Progression
Select Stats for Chart
Play Type Usage (Poss Freq%)
Play Type
Possession Outcomes
Shooting Volume & Efficiency
Hexbin Chart (eFG%)
Less
More
Cold
Hot
Zone Breakdown
Detailed Metrics
RIM
69 FGA
59.6%
27TH %ILE
PAINT
63 FGA
45.3%
64TH %ILE
MIDRANGE
100 FGA
45.1%
73TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (L)
25 FGA
25.0%
34TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (R)
18 FGA
40.0%
67TH %ILE
ABOVE BREAK 3
170 FGA
31.7%
46TH %ILE
Trades
Rumors and transaction history will appear here.
Stat
What it means
Formula
League context
League avg
—