DeMar DeRozan
Team
Sacramento Kings
Pos
G
No.
10
HT
6-6
WT
220
Age
36
(Aug 7, 1989)
College
Southern California
Draft
2009 (R1 P9)
Season Snapshot
2025
18.2
3.0
3.9
59%
With Teammate
0 Mins
Without Teammate
0 Mins
Most Impactful Pairings
DeRozan
DeRozan
Stat Impact
Core
Shooting
Defense & Discipline
Scoring Counts
Assisted vs Unassisted
Shot Diet & Point Mix
Playmaking
Touches & Passing Volume
Shot Quality
Defensive Playmaking
Contests
Matchups
Defense by Distance
Rebounding
Hustle Plays
Movement
Compare this player
Stat basis
Player season
Compare season
DeMar DeRozan
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Search for a player above to begin.
Share this chart with anyone who needs to lose an argument.
DeMar DeRozan
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Pick a comparison player to generate the biased list.
Polls
Log in to vote.
No active polls right now.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to start the discussion.
Loading more…
Page 1 / 1
Saved.
Financial Summary: DeMar DeRozan
TOTAL VALUE
$50.3M
AVG. ANNUAL (AAV)
$25.2M
| Season | Team | Base Salary | Cap Hit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | SAC | $24,570,000 | $24,570,000 |
| 2026-27 | SAC | $25,740,000 | $25,740,000 |
| 2027-28 | SAC | UFA | |
All Lineup Combinations
Career Statistics
| Season | Team | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 |
TOR
|
82 | 36.7 | 18.1 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 6.7 | 15.0 | 44.5% | 0.4 | 1.5 | 28.3% | 4.3 | 5.2 | 83.1% | 52.3% | — |
| 2013 |
TOR
|
79 | 38.2 | 22.7 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 7.6 | 17.8 | 42.9% | 0.8 | 2.7 | 30.5% | 6.6 | 8.0 | 82.4% | 53.2% | — |
| 2014 |
TOR
|
60 | 35.0 | 20.1 | 4.6 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 6.8 | 16.5 | 41.3% | 0.4 | 1.5 | 28.4% | 6.0 | 7.2 | 83.2% | 51.0% | — |
| 2015 |
TOR
|
78 | 36.0 | 23.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 7.9 | 17.7 | 44.6% | 0.6 | 1.8 | 33.8% | 7.1 | 8.4 | 85.0% | 55.0% | — |
| 2016 |
TOR
|
74 | 35.4 | 27.3 | 5.2 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 9.7 | 20.9 | 46.7% | 0.4 | 1.7 | 26.6% | 7.4 | 8.7 | 84.2% | 55.2% | — |
| 2017 |
TOR
|
80 | 33.9 | 23.0 | 3.9 | 5.2 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 8.1 | 17.7 | 45.6% | 1.1 | 3.6 | 31.0% | 5.8 | 7.0 | 82.5% | 55.5% | — |
| 2018 |
SAS
|
77 | 34.9 | 21.2 | 6.0 | 6.2 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 8.2 | 17.1 | 48.1% | 0.1 | 0.6 | 15.6% | 4.8 | 5.7 | 83.0% | 54.2% | — |
| 2019 |
SAS
|
68 | 34.1 | 22.1 | 5.5 | 5.6 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 8.2 | 15.4 | 53.1% | 0.1 | 0.5 | 25.7% | 5.6 | 6.6 | 84.5% | 60.3% | — |
| 2020 |
SAS
|
61 | 33.7 | 21.6 | 4.2 | 6.9 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 7.5 | 15.1 | 49.5% | 0.3 | 1.2 | 25.7% | 6.3 | 7.2 | 88.0% | 59.1% | — |
| 2021 |
CHI
|
76 | 36.1 | 27.9 | 5.2 | 4.9 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 10.2 | 20.2 | 50.4% | 0.7 | 1.9 | 35.2% | 6.8 | 7.8 | 87.7% | 59.0% | — |
| 2022 |
CHI
|
76 | 36.4 | 24.5 | 4.7 | 5.1 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 8.9 | 17.6 | 50.4% | 0.6 | 1.9 | 31.7% | 6.1 | 7.1 | 87.0% | 59.1% | — |
| 2023 |
CHI
|
81 | 38.0 | 24.0 | 4.3 | 5.4 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 8.2 | 17.2 | 48.1% | 1.0 | 2.9 | 33.9% | 6.5 | 7.6 | 85.3% | 58.4% | — |
| 2024 |
SAC
|
78 | 36.0 | 22.4 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 8.2 | 17.1 | 47.7% | 1.1 | 3.3 | 33.0% | 4.9 | 5.7 | 85.7% | 56.9% | — |
| 2025 |
SAC
|
64 | 31.8 | 18.2 | 3.0 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 6.3 | 12.9 | 48.8% | 0.7 | 2.0 | 32.6% | 4.9 | 5.7 | 86.2% | 58.8% | — |
🧊 Playoffs? Never heard of ’emThis player hasn’t made the postseason yet. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Progression
Select Stats for Chart
Play Type Usage (Poss Freq%)
Play Type
Possession Outcomes
Shooting Volume & Efficiency
Hexbin Chart (eFG%)
Less
More
Cold
Hot
Zone Breakdown
Detailed Metrics
RIM
91 FGA
71.6%
78TH %ILE
PAINT
221 FGA
51.6%
84TH %ILE
MIDRANGE
403 FGA
47.3%
79TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (L)
32 FGA
41.2%
70TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (R)
19 FGA
25.0%
35TH %ILE
ABOVE BREAK 3
84 FGA
31.3%
44TH %ILE
Trades
Rumors and transaction history will appear here.
Stat
What it means
Formula
League context
League avg
—