Andre Drummond
Team
Philadelphia 76ers
Pos
C
No.
1
HT
6-11
WT
279
Age
32
(Aug 10, 1993)
College
Connecticut
Draft
2012 (R1 P9)
Season Snapshot
2025
6.5
8.5
1.0
55%
With Teammate
0 Mins
Without Teammate
0 Mins
Most Impactful Pairings
Drummond
Drummond
Stat Impact
Core
Shooting
Defense & Discipline
Scoring Counts
Assisted vs Unassisted
Shot Diet & Point Mix
Playmaking
Touches & Passing Volume
Shot Quality
Defensive Playmaking
Contests
Matchups
Defense by Distance
Rebounding
Hustle Plays
Movement
Compare this player
Stat basis
Player season
Compare season
Andre Drummond
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Search for a player above to begin.
Share this chart with anyone who needs to lose an argument.
Andre Drummond
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Pick a comparison player to generate the biased list.
Polls
Log in to vote.
No active polls right now.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to start the discussion.
Loading more…
Page 1 / 1
Saved.
Financial Summary: Andre Drummond
TOTAL VALUE
$5M
AVG. ANNUAL (AAV)
$5M
| Season | Team | Base Salary | Cap Hit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | PHI | $5,000,000 | $5,000,000 |
| 2026-27 | PHI | UFA | |
All Lineup Combinations
Career Statistics
| Season | Team | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 |
DET
|
60 | 20.7 | 7.9 | 7.6 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 5.7 | 60.8% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0% | 1.0 | 2.6 | 37.1% | 57.8% | — |
| 2013 |
DET
|
81 | 32.3 | 13.5 | 13.2 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 3.4 | 5.9 | 9.5 | 62.3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 1.7 | 4.0 | 41.8% | 59.9% | — |
| 2014 |
DET
|
82 | 30.5 | 13.8 | 13.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 6.0 | 11.7 | 51.4% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 1.7 | 4.5 | 38.9% | 50.4% | — |
| 2015 |
DET
|
81 | 32.9 | 16.2 | 14.8 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 6.8 | 13.1 | 52.1% | 0.0 | 0.1 | 33.3% | 2.6 | 7.2 | 35.5% | 49.9% | — |
| 2016 |
DET
|
81 | 29.8 | 13.6 | 13.8 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 6.0 | 11.2 | 53.0% | 0.0 | 0.1 | 28.6% | 1.7 | 4.4 | 38.6% | 51.8% | — |
| 2017 |
DET
|
78 | 33.6 | 15.0 | 16.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 6.0 | 11.3 | 52.9% | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 3.1 | 5.1 | 60.5% | 55.5% | — |
| 2018 |
DET
|
79 | 33.5 | 17.3 | 15.6 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 7.1 | 13.3 | 53.3% | 0.1 | 0.5 | 13.2% | 3.1 | 5.2 | 59.0% | 55.5% | — |
| 2019 |
CLE
|
8 | 28.2 | 17.5 | 11.1 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 7.2 | 13.1 | 55.2% | 0.5 | 1.8 | 28.6% | 2.5 | 4.9 | 51.3% | 57.3% | — |
| 2019 |
DET
|
49 | 33.8 | 17.8 | 15.8 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 7.3 | 13.9 | 53.0% | 0.0 | 0.4 | 4.8% | 3.0 | 5.2 | 58.4% | 55.0% | — |
| 2019 |
TOT
|
57 | 33.0 | 17.7 | 15.2 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 7.3 | 13.8 | 53.3% | 0.1 | 0.6 | 14.3% | 3.0 | 5.2 | 57.5% | 55.3% | — |
| 2020 |
LAL
|
21 | 24.8 | 11.9 | 10.2 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 4.9 | 9.1 | 53.1% | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 2.2 | 3.6 | 60.5% | 55.4% | — |
| 2020 |
CLE
|
25 | 28.8 | 17.5 | 13.5 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 7.2 | 15.2 | 47.4% | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 3.1 | 5.2 | 59.7% | 50.0% | — |
| 2020 |
TOT
|
46 | 27.0 | 14.9 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 2.7 | 3.2 | 6.1 | 12.4 | 49.3% | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0% | 2.7 | 4.5 | 60.0% | 51.9% | — |
| 2021 |
BKN
|
24 | 22.4 | 11.8 | 10.3 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 8.1 | 61.0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 1.8 | 3.4 | 53.7% | 61.0% | — |
| 2021 |
PHI
|
49 | 18.4 | 6.1 | 8.8 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 4.9 | 53.8% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.9 | 1.7 | 51.2% | 54.4% | — |
| 2021 |
TOT
|
73 | 19.7 | 8.0 | 9.3 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 5.9 | 57.0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 1.2 | 2.2 | 52.4% | 57.4% | — |
| 2022 |
CHI
|
69 | 12.5 | 5.9 | 6.6 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 4.1 | 60.7% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 1.0 | 1.8 | 53.2% | 60.7% | — |
| 2023 |
CHI
|
81 | 16.9 | 8.3 | 8.8 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 3.3 | 6.0 | 55.3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 1.6 | 2.7 | 59.2% | 57.3% | — |
| 2024 |
PHI
|
40 | 18.7 | 7.3 | 7.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 5.8 | 50.0% | 0.1 | 0.5 | 15.0% | 1.4 | 2.2 | 62.2% | 53.5% | — |
| 2025 |
PHI
|
49 | 19.5 | 6.5 | 8.4 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 5.3 | 48.4% | 0.4 | 1.4 | 32.8% | 1.0 | 1.5 | 62.7% | 54.8% | — |
🧊 Playoffs? Never heard of ’emThis player hasn’t made the postseason yet. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Progression
Select Stats for Chart
Play Type Usage (Poss Freq%)
Play Type
Possession Outcomes
Shooting Volume & Efficiency
Hexbin Chart (eFG%)
Less
More
Cold
Hot
Zone Breakdown
Detailed Metrics
RIM
211 FGA
55.6%
18TH %ILE
PAINT
38 FGA
50.0%
81TH %ILE
MIDRANGE
6 FGA
0.0%
19TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (L)
44 FGA
27.3%
38TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (R)
32 FGA
47.8%
82TH %ILE
ABOVE BREAK 3
12 FGA
18.2%
19TH %ILE
Trades
Rumors and transaction history will appear here.
Stat
What it means
Formula
League context
League avg
—