Rudy Gobert
Team
Minnesota Timberwolves
Pos
C
No.
27
HT
7-1
WT
258
Age
33
(Jun 26, 1992)
College
Cholet
Draft
2013 (R1 P27)
Season Snapshot
2025
11.0
11.4
1.7
68%
With Teammate
0 Mins
Without Teammate
0 Mins
Most Impactful Pairings
Gobert
Gobert
Stat Impact
Core
Shooting
Defense & Discipline
Scoring Counts
Assisted vs Unassisted
Shot Diet & Point Mix
Playmaking
Touches & Passing Volume
Shot Quality
Defensive Playmaking
Contests
Matchups
Defense by Distance
Rebounding
Hustle Plays
Movement
Compare this player
Stat basis
Player season
Compare season
Rudy Gobert
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Search for a player above to begin.
Share this chart with anyone who needs to lose an argument.
Rudy Gobert
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Pick a comparison player to generate the biased list.
Polls
Log in to vote.
No active polls right now.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to start the discussion.
Loading more…
Page 1 / 1
Saved.
Financial Summary: Rudy Gobert
TOTAL VALUE
$110M
AVG. ANNUAL (AAV)
$36.5M
| Season | Team | Base Salary | Cap Hit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | MIN | $35,000,000 | $35,000,000 |
| 2026-27 | MIN | $36,500,000 | $36,500,000 |
| 2027-28 | MIN | $38,000,000 | $38,000,000 |
| 2028-29 | MIN | UFA | |
All Lineup Combinations
Career Statistics
| Season | Team | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 |
UTA
|
82 | 26.3 | 8.4 | 9.4 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 5.2 | 60.4% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 2.1 | 3.3 | 62.3% | 62.7% | — |
| 2015 |
UTA
|
61 | 31.7 | 9.1 | 10.9 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 3.2 | 5.8 | 55.9% | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 2.6 | 4.6 | 56.9% | 58.2% | — |
| 2016 |
UTA
|
81 | 33.9 | 14.0 | 12.8 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 5.1 | 7.7 | 66.1% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 3.8 | 5.9 | 65.3% | 68.1% | — |
| 2017 |
UTA
|
56 | 32.4 | 13.5 | 10.7 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 4.9 | 7.9 | 62.2% | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 3.6 | 5.3 | 68.2% | 65.7% | — |
| 2018 |
UTA
|
81 | 31.8 | 15.8 | 12.8 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 5.9 | 8.8 | 66.9% | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 4.1 | 6.4 | 63.6% | 68.2% | — |
| 2019 |
UTA
|
68 | 34.3 | 15.1 | 13.5 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 3.2 | 5.7 | 8.2 | 69.3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 3.7 | 5.9 | 63.0% | 69.9% | — |
| 2020 |
UTA
|
71 | 30.8 | 14.3 | 13.5 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 5.5 | 8.2 | 67.5% | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 3.3 | 5.3 | 62.3% | 68.3% | — |
| 2021 |
UTA
|
66 | 32.1 | 15.6 | 14.7 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 5.5 | 7.7 | 71.3% | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 4.6 | 6.7 | 69.0% | 73.2% | — |
| 2022 |
MIN
|
71 | 30.7 | 13.5 | 11.6 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 5.2 | 7.8 | 65.7% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 3.2 | 5.0 | 64.4% | 67.3% | — |
| 2023 |
MIN
|
76 | 34.1 | 14.0 | 12.9 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 5.3 | 8.1 | 66.2% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 3.3 | 5.1 | 63.8% | 67.6% | — |
| 2024 |
MIN
|
72 | 33.2 | 12.0 | 10.9 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 4.7 | 7.1 | 66.9% | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 2.6 | 3.8 | 67.4% | 68.7% | — |
| 2025 |
MIN
|
61 | 31.5 | 11.0 | 11.4 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 4.5 | 6.3 | 70.8% | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 2.1 | 4.1 | 50.0% | 67.7% | — |
🧊 Playoffs? Never heard of ’emThis player hasn’t made the postseason yet. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Progression
Select Stats for Chart
Play Type Usage (Poss Freq%)
Play Type
Possession Outcomes
Shooting Volume & Efficiency
Hexbin Chart (eFG%)
Less
More
Cold
Hot
Zone Breakdown
Detailed Metrics
RIM
339 FGA
76.7%
89TH %ILE
PAINT
51 FGA
44.7%
61TH %ILE
MIDRANGE
6 FGA
14.3%
26TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (L)
0 FGA
0.0%
14TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (R)
0 FGA
0.0%
14TH %ILE
ABOVE BREAK 3
0 FGA
0.0%
8TH %ILE
Trades
Rumors and transaction history will appear here.
Stat
What it means
Formula
League context
League avg
—