Jerami Grant
Team
Portland Trail Blazers
Pos
F
No.
9
HT
6-7
WT
213
Age
31
(Mar 12, 1994)
College
Syracuse
Draft
2014 (R2 P39)
Season Snapshot
2025
18.9
3.5
2.3
60%
With Teammate
0 Mins
Without Teammate
0 Mins
Most Impactful Pairings
Grant
Grant
Stat Impact
Core
Shooting
Defense & Discipline
Scoring Counts
Assisted vs Unassisted
Shot Diet & Point Mix
Playmaking
Touches & Passing Volume
Shot Quality
Defensive Playmaking
Contests
Matchups
Defense by Distance
Rebounding
Hustle Plays
Movement
Compare this player
Stat basis
Player season
Compare season
Jerami Grant
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Search for a player above to begin.
Share this chart with anyone who needs to lose an argument.
Jerami Grant
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Pick a comparison player to generate the biased list.
Polls
Log in to vote.
No active polls right now.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to start the discussion.
Loading more…
Page 1 / 1
Saved.
Financial Summary: Jerami Grant
TOTAL VALUE
$103M
AVG. ANNUAL (AAV)
$34.2M
| Season | Team | Base Salary | Cap Hit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | POR | $32,000,001 | $32,000,001 |
| 2026-27 | POR | $34,206,898 | $34,206,898 |
| 2027-28 | POR | $36,413,790 | $36,413,790 |
| 2028-29 | POR | UFA | |
All Lineup Combinations
Career Statistics
| Season | Team | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 |
PHI
|
65 | 21.2 | 6.3 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 5.4 | 35.2% | 0.8 | 2.4 | 31.4% | 1.8 | 3.0 | 59.1% | 47.0% | — |
| 2015 |
PHI
|
77 | 26.8 | 9.7 | 4.7 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 7.8 | 41.9% | 0.5 | 1.9 | 24.0% | 2.8 | 4.2 | 65.8% | 50.6% | — |
| 2016 |
PHI
|
2 | 20.6 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 8.5 | 35.3% | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0% | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50.0% | 39.0% | — |
| 2016 |
OKC
|
78 | 19.1 | 5.4 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 4.0 | 46.9% | 0.6 | 1.5 | 37.7% | 1.1 | 1.8 | 61.9% | 56.6% | — |
| 2016 |
TOT
|
80 | 19.1 | 5.5 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 4.1 | 46.3% | 0.5 | 1.4 | 37.1% | 1.1 | 1.8 | 61.2% | 55.6% | — |
| 2017 |
OKC
|
81 | 20.3 | 8.4 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 5.6 | 53.5% | 0.4 | 1.4 | 29.1% | 2.0 | 3.0 | 67.5% | 60.7% | — |
| 2018 |
OKC
|
80 | 32.6 | 13.6 | 5.2 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 5.1 | 10.3 | 49.7% | 1.4 | 3.7 | 39.2% | 2.0 | 2.8 | 71.0% | 59.2% | — |
| 2019 |
DEN
|
71 | 26.6 | 12.0 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 4.3 | 8.9 | 47.8% | 1.4 | 3.5 | 38.9% | 2.1 | 2.8 | 75.0% | 59.1% | — |
| 2020 |
DET
|
54 | 33.9 | 22.3 | 4.6 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 7.4 | 17.3 | 42.9% | 2.1 | 6.1 | 35.0% | 5.4 | 6.4 | 84.5% | 55.6% | — |
| 2021 |
DET
|
47 | 31.9 | 19.2 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 6.3 | 14.9 | 42.6% | 1.9 | 5.4 | 35.8% | 4.6 | 5.5 | 83.8% | 55.6% | — |
| 2022 |
POR
|
63 | 35.6 | 20.5 | 4.5 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 6.9 | 14.5 | 47.5% | 2.3 | 5.7 | 40.1% | 4.4 | 5.4 | 81.3% | 60.6% | — |
| 2023 |
POR
|
54 | 34.0 | 21.0 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 7.1 | 15.7 | 45.1% | 2.1 | 5.1 | 40.2% | 4.7 | 5.8 | 81.7% | 57.3% | — |
| 2024 |
POR
|
47 | 32.5 | 14.4 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 4.6 | 12.2 | 37.3% | 2.3 | 6.3 | 36.5% | 3.0 | 3.5 | 84.9% | 52.3% | — |
| 2025 |
POR
|
49 | 29.7 | 18.9 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 5.8 | 13.0 | 44.7% | 2.3 | 6.0 | 38.3% | 4.9 | 6.0 | 81.4% | 60.1% | — |
🧊 Playoffs? Never heard of ’emThis player hasn’t made the postseason yet. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Progression
Select Stats for Chart
Play Type Usage (Poss Freq%)
Play Type
Possession Outcomes
Shooting Volume & Efficiency
Hexbin Chart (eFG%)
Less
More
Cold
Hot
Zone Breakdown
Detailed Metrics
RIM
273 FGA
62.8%
38TH %ILE
PAINT
117 FGA
31.8%
27TH %ILE
MIDRANGE
65 FGA
29.2%
40TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (L)
52 FGA
35.0%
54TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (R)
97 FGA
46.7%
81TH %ILE
ABOVE BREAK 3
240 FGA
35.6%
66TH %ILE
Trades
Rumors and transaction history will appear here.
Stat
What it means
Formula
League context
League avg
—