Tobias Harris
Team
Detroit Pistons
Pos
F
No.
12
HT
6-8
WT
226
Age
33
(Jul 15, 1992)
College
Tennessee
Draft
2011 (R1 P19)
Season Snapshot
2025
13.3
5.2
2.2
56%
With Teammate
0 Mins
Without Teammate
0 Mins
Most Impactful Pairings
Harris
Harris
Stat Impact
Core
Shooting
Defense & Discipline
Scoring Counts
Assisted vs Unassisted
Shot Diet & Point Mix
Playmaking
Touches & Passing Volume
Shot Quality
Defensive Playmaking
Contests
Matchups
Defense by Distance
Rebounding
Hustle Plays
Movement
Compare this player
Stat basis
Player season
Compare season
Tobias Harris
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Search for a player above to begin.
Share this chart with anyone who needs to lose an argument.
Tobias Harris
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Pick a comparison player to generate the biased list.
Polls
Log in to vote.
No active polls right now.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to start the discussion.
Loading more…
Page 1 / 1
Saved.
Financial Summary: Tobias Harris
TOTAL VALUE
$26.6M
AVG. ANNUAL (AAV)
$26.6M
| Season | Team | Base Salary | Cap Hit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | DET | $26,634,146 | $26,634,146 |
| 2026-27 | DET | UFA | |
All Lineup Combinations
Career Statistics
| Season | Team | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 |
MIL
|
28 | 11.5 | 4.9 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 4.1 | 46.1% | 0.2 | 0.8 | 33.3% | 0.8 | 0.9 | 88.5% | 53.8% | — |
| 2012 |
ORL
|
27 | 36.1 | 17.3 | 8.5 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 3.3 | 6.7 | 14.7 | 45.3% | 1.0 | 3.2 | 31.0% | 3.0 | 4.1 | 72.1% | 52.4% | — |
| 2012 |
TOT
|
55 | 23.6 | 11.0 | 5.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 4.2 | 9.3 | 45.5% | 0.6 | 2.0 | 31.5% | 1.9 | 2.5 | 75.2% | 52.7% | — |
| 2013 |
ORL
|
61 | 30.3 | 14.6 | 7.0 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 5.4 | 11.7 | 46.4% | 0.5 | 2.1 | 25.4% | 3.2 | 4.0 | 80.7% | 54.2% | — |
| 2014 |
ORL
|
68 | 34.8 | 17.1 | 6.3 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 6.5 | 14.0 | 46.6% | 1.3 | 3.5 | 36.4% | 2.8 | 3.6 | 78.8% | 55.1% | — |
| 2015 |
DET
|
27 | 33.5 | 16.6 | 6.2 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 6.1 | 12.9 | 47.7% | 1.2 | 3.3 | 37.5% | 3.0 | 3.3 | 91.1% | 57.7% | — |
| 2015 |
ORL
|
49 | 32.9 | 13.7 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 5.1 | 11.0 | 46.4% | 1.0 | 3.1 | 31.1% | 2.4 | 3.1 | 78.4% | 55.0% | — |
| 2015 |
TOT
|
76 | 33.1 | 14.7 | 6.7 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 5.5 | 11.7 | 46.9% | 1.1 | 3.1 | 33.5% | 2.7 | 3.2 | 83.1% | 56.0% | — |
| 2016 |
DET
|
82 | 31.3 | 16.1 | 5.1 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 6.2 | 13.0 | 48.1% | 1.3 | 3.8 | 34.7% | 2.3 | 2.8 | 84.1% | 56.8% | — |
| 2017 |
LAC
|
32 | 34.5 | 19.3 | 6.0 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 7.6 | 16.0 | 47.3% | 2.2 | 5.3 | 41.4% | 2.0 | 2.5 | 80.0% | 56.5% | — |
| 2017 |
DET
|
48 | 32.6 | 18.1 | 5.1 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 6.7 | 14.8 | 45.1% | 2.4 | 5.8 | 40.9% | 2.4 | 2.8 | 84.6% | 56.4% | — |
| 2017 |
TOT
|
80 | 33.4 | 18.6 | 5.5 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 15.3 | 46.0% | 2.3 | 5.6 | 41.1% | 2.2 | 2.7 | 82.9% | 56.5% | — |
| 2018 |
LAC
|
55 | 34.6 | 20.9 | 7.8 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 7.7 | 15.5 | 49.6% | 2.0 | 4.7 | 43.4% | 3.5 | 4.0 | 87.7% | 60.5% | — |
| 2018 |
PHI
|
27 | 35.0 | 18.2 | 7.9 | 2.9 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 6.9 | 14.8 | 46.9% | 1.6 | 5.0 | 32.6% | 2.7 | 3.3 | 84.1% | 56.2% | — |
| 2018 |
TOT
|
82 | 34.8 | 20.1 | 7.9 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 7.5 | 15.3 | 48.7% | 1.9 | 4.8 | 39.7% | 3.2 | 3.7 | 86.6% | 59.2% | — |
| 2019 |
PHI
|
72 | 34.3 | 19.6 | 6.9 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 7.7 | 16.3 | 47.1% | 1.8 | 5.0 | 36.7% | 2.4 | 3.0 | 80.6% | 55.6% | — |
| 2020 |
PHI
|
62 | 32.5 | 19.5 | 6.8 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 7.6 | 14.9 | 51.2% | 1.3 | 3.4 | 39.4% | 2.9 | 3.3 | 89.2% | 59.7% | — |
| 2021 |
PHI
|
73 | 34.8 | 17.2 | 6.8 | 3.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 6.8 | 14.0 | 48.2% | 1.4 | 3.8 | 36.7% | 2.3 | 2.8 | 84.2% | 56.6% | — |
| 2022 |
PHI
|
74 | 32.9 | 14.7 | 5.7 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 5.7 | 11.4 | 50.1% | 1.7 | 4.4 | 38.9% | 1.5 | 1.7 | 87.6% | 60.2% | — |
| 2023 |
PHI
|
71 | 33.7 | 17.1 | 6.5 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 6.6 | 13.5 | 48.6% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 34.9% | 2.6 | 3.0 | 87.4% | 57.5% | — |
| 2024 |
DET
|
73 | 31.6 | 13.7 | 5.9 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 5.3 | 11.0 | 47.7% | 1.2 | 3.6 | 34.5% | 2.0 | 2.3 | 86.1% | 57.1% | — |
| 2025 |
DET
|
47 | 28.5 | 13.3 | 5.2 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 4.9 | 10.7 | 45.3% | 1.3 | 3.8 | 33.5% | 2.3 | 2.6 | 87.9% | 56.0% | — |
🧊 Playoffs? Never heard of ’emThis player hasn’t made the postseason yet. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Progression
Select Stats for Chart
Play Type Usage (Poss Freq%)
Play Type
Possession Outcomes
Shooting Volume & Efficiency
Hexbin Chart (eFG%)
Less
More
Cold
Hot
Zone Breakdown
Detailed Metrics
RIM
132 FGA
55.0%
17TH %ILE
PAINT
176 FGA
48.1%
74TH %ILE
MIDRANGE
119 FGA
53.8%
90TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (L)
37 FGA
34.5%
53TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (R)
69 FGA
37.3%
59TH %ILE
ABOVE BREAK 3
132 FGA
31.3%
43TH %ILE
Trades
Rumors and transaction history will appear here.
Stat
What it means
Formula
League context
League avg
—