LeBron James
Team
Los Angeles Lakers
Pos
F
No.
23
HT
6-9
WT
250
Age
41
(Dec 30, 1984)
College
St. Vincent-St. Mary HS (OH)
Draft
2003 (R1 P1)
Season Snapshot
2025
21.4
5.6
7.0
59%
With Teammate
0 Mins
Without Teammate
0 Mins
Most Impactful Pairings
James
James
Stat Impact
Core
Shooting
Defense & Discipline
Scoring Counts
Assisted vs Unassisted
Shot Diet & Point Mix
Playmaking
Touches & Passing Volume
Shot Quality
Defensive Playmaking
Contests
Matchups
Defense by Distance
Rebounding
Hustle Plays
Movement
Compare this player
Stat basis
Player season
Compare season
LeBron James
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Search for a player above to begin.
Share this chart with anyone who needs to lose an argument.
LeBron James
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Pick a comparison player to generate the biased list.
Polls
Log in to vote.
No active polls right now.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to start the discussion.
Loading more…
Page 1 / 1
Saved.
Financial Summary: LeBron James
TOTAL VALUE
$52.6M
AVG. ANNUAL (AAV)
$52.6M
| Season | Team | Base Salary | Cap Hit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | LAL | $52,627,153 | $52,627,153 |
| 2026-27 | LAL | UFA | |
All Lineup Combinations
Career Statistics
| Season | Team | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
CLE
|
79 | 39.6 | 20.9 | 5.5 | 5.9 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 1.9 | 7.9 | 18.9 | 41.7% | 0.8 | 2.7 | 29.0% | 4.4 | 5.8 | 75.4% | 48.8% | — |
| 2004 |
CLE
|
80 | 42.3 | 27.2 | 7.3 | 7.2 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 9.9 | 21.1 | 47.2% | 1.4 | 3.9 | 35.1% | 6.0 | 8.0 | 75.0% | 55.4% | — |
| 2005 |
CLE
|
79 | 42.5 | 31.4 | 7.0 | 6.6 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 11.1 | 23.1 | 48.0% | 1.6 | 4.8 | 33.5% | 7.6 | 10.3 | 73.8% | 56.8% | — |
| 2006 |
CLE
|
78 | 40.9 | 27.3 | 6.7 | 6.0 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 9.9 | 20.8 | 47.6% | 1.3 | 4.0 | 31.9% | 6.3 | 9.0 | 69.8% | 55.2% | — |
| 2007 |
CLE
|
75 | 40.4 | 30.0 | 7.9 | 7.2 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 10.6 | 21.9 | 48.4% | 1.5 | 4.8 | 31.5% | 7.3 | 10.3 | 71.2% | 56.8% | — |
| 2008 |
CLE
|
81 | 37.7 | 28.4 | 7.6 | 7.2 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 9.7 | 19.9 | 48.9% | 1.6 | 4.7 | 34.4% | 7.3 | 9.4 | 78.0% | 59.1% | — |
| 2009 |
CLE
|
76 | 39.0 | 29.7 | 7.3 | 8.6 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 10.1 | 20.1 | 50.3% | 1.7 | 5.1 | 33.3% | 7.8 | 10.2 | 76.7% | 60.4% | — |
| 2010 |
MIA
|
79 | 38.8 | 26.7 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 3.6 | 2.1 | 9.6 | 18.8 | 51.0% | 1.2 | 3.5 | 33.0% | 6.4 | 8.4 | 75.9% | 59.4% | — |
| 2011 |
MIA
|
62 | 37.5 | 27.1 | 7.9 | 6.2 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 10.0 | 18.9 | 53.1% | 0.9 | 2.4 | 36.2% | 6.2 | 8.1 | 77.1% | 60.5% | — |
| 2012 |
MIA
|
76 | 37.9 | 26.8 | 8.0 | 7.2 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 10.1 | 17.8 | 56.5% | 1.4 | 3.3 | 40.6% | 5.3 | 7.0 | 75.3% | 64.0% | — |
| 2013 |
MIA
|
77 | 37.7 | 27.1 | 6.9 | 6.3 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 3.5 | 1.6 | 10.0 | 17.6 | 56.7% | 1.5 | 4.0 | 37.9% | 5.7 | 7.6 | 75.0% | 64.9% | — |
| 2014 |
CLE
|
69 | 36.1 | 25.3 | 6.0 | 7.4 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 3.9 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 18.5 | 48.8% | 1.7 | 4.9 | 35.4% | 5.4 | 7.7 | 71.0% | 57.7% | — |
| 2015 |
CLE
|
76 | 35.6 | 25.3 | 7.4 | 6.8 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 3.3 | 1.9 | 9.7 | 18.6 | 52.0% | 1.1 | 3.7 | 30.9% | 4.7 | 6.5 | 73.1% | 58.8% | — |
| 2016 |
CLE
|
74 | 37.8 | 26.4 | 8.6 | 8.7 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 9.9 | 18.2 | 54.8% | 1.7 | 4.6 | 36.3% | 4.8 | 7.2 | 67.4% | 61.9% | — |
| 2017 |
CLE
|
82 | 36.9 | 27.4 | 8.7 | 9.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 4.2 | 1.7 | 10.5 | 19.3 | 54.2% | 1.8 | 5.0 | 36.7% | 4.7 | 6.5 | 73.1% | 62.1% | — |
| 2018 |
LAL
|
55 | 35.2 | 27.4 | 8.4 | 8.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 10.1 | 19.9 | 51.0% | 2.0 | 5.9 | 33.9% | 5.1 | 7.6 | 66.5% | 58.8% | — |
| 2019 |
LAL
|
67 | 34.6 | 25.3 | 7.8 | 10.2 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 9.6 | 19.4 | 49.3% | 2.2 | 6.3 | 34.8% | 3.9 | 5.7 | 69.3% | 57.7% | — |
| 2020 |
LAL
|
45 | 33.4 | 25.0 | 7.7 | 7.8 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 9.4 | 18.3 | 51.3% | 2.3 | 6.3 | 36.5% | 4.0 | 5.7 | 69.8% | 60.2% | — |
| 2021 |
LAL
|
56 | 37.2 | 30.3 | 8.2 | 6.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 11.4 | 21.8 | 52.4% | 2.9 | 8.0 | 35.9% | 4.5 | 6.0 | 75.6% | 61.9% | — |
| 2022 |
LAL
|
56 | 35.7 | 28.9 | 8.3 | 6.8 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 11.1 | 22.1 | 50.1% | 2.2 | 6.8 | 32.4% | 4.5 | 5.9 | 77.0% | 58.5% | — |
| 2023 |
LAL
|
73 | 35.4 | 25.6 | 7.4 | 8.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 3.5 | 1.1 | 9.6 | 17.9 | 53.5% | 2.1 | 5.1 | 40.7% | 4.3 | 5.7 | 75.7% | 62.5% | — |
| 2024 |
LAL
|
70 | 35.0 | 24.4 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 3.7 | 1.4 | 9.3 | 18.1 | 51.3% | 2.1 | 5.7 | 37.6% | 3.7 | 4.7 | 78.2% | 60.4% | — |
| 2025 |
LAL
|
44 | 33.2 | 21.4 | 5.6 | 7.0 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 8.0 | 16.0 | 50.4% | 1.4 | 4.6 | 31.3% | 3.9 | 5.2 | 74.5% | 58.7% | — |
🧊 Playoffs? Never heard of ’emThis player hasn’t made the postseason yet. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Progression
Select Stats for Chart
Play Type Usage (Poss Freq%)
Play Type
Possession Outcomes
Shooting Volume & Efficiency
Hexbin Chart (eFG%)
Less
More
Cold
Hot
Zone Breakdown
Detailed Metrics
RIM
364 FGA
74.6%
84TH %ILE
PAINT
201 FGA
44.5%
60TH %ILE
MIDRANGE
169 FGA
38.8%
56TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (L)
32 FGA
20.8%
30TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (R)
26 FGA
31.3%
43TH %ILE
ABOVE BREAK 3
240 FGA
32.9%
51TH %ILE
Trades
Rumors and transaction history will appear here.
Stat
What it means
Formula
League context
League avg
—