Kyle Lowry
Team
Philadelphia 76ers
Pos
G
No.
7
HT
6-0
WT
196
Age
39
(Mar 25, 1986)
College
Villanova
Draft
2006 (R1 P24)
Season Snapshot
2025
1.8
0.8
1.1
48%
With Teammate
0 Mins
Without Teammate
0 Mins
Most Impactful Pairings
Lowry
Lowry
Stat Impact
Core
Shooting
Defense & Discipline
Scoring Counts
Assisted vs Unassisted
Shot Diet & Point Mix
Playmaking
Touches & Passing Volume
Shot Quality
Defensive Playmaking
Contests
Matchups
Defense by Distance
Rebounding
Hustle Plays
Movement
Compare this player
Stat basis
Player season
Compare season
Kyle Lowry
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Search for a player above to begin.
Share this chart with anyone who needs to lose an argument.
Kyle Lowry
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Pick a comparison player to generate the biased list.
Polls
Log in to vote.
No active polls right now.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to start the discussion.
Loading more…
Page 1 / 1
Saved.
Financial Summary: Kyle Lowry
TOTAL VALUE
$2.3M
AVG. ANNUAL (AAV)
$2.3M
| Season | Team | Base Salary | Cap Hit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | PHI | $2,296,274 | $2,296,274 |
| 2026-27 | PHI | UFA | |
All Lineup Combinations
Career Statistics
| Season | Team | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 |
MEM
|
10 | 17.5 | 5.6 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 3.8 | 36.8% | 0.3 | 0.8 | 37.5% | 2.5 | 2.8 | 89.3% | 55.6% | — |
| 2007 |
MEM
|
82 | 25.5 | 9.7 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 3.1 | 7.2 | 43.2% | 0.4 | 1.7 | 25.7% | 3.0 | 4.2 | 69.8% | 53.1% | — |
| 2008 |
HOU
|
28 | 21.7 | 7.6 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 5.8 | 47.5% | 0.3 | 1.0 | 27.6% | 1.9 | 2.3 | 80.0% | 56.1% | — |
| 2008 |
MEM
|
49 | 21.9 | 7.5 | 2.3 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 5.6 | 41.2% | 0.3 | 1.4 | 24.6% | 2.6 | 3.3 | 80.1% | 54.0% | — |
| 2008 |
TOT
|
77 | 21.8 | 7.6 | 2.5 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 5.6 | 43.5% | 0.3 | 1.3 | 25.5% | 2.4 | 2.9 | 80.1% | 54.7% | — |
| 2009 |
HOU
|
68 | 24.3 | 9.1 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 6.8 | 39.7% | 0.5 | 2.0 | 27.2% | 3.2 | 3.8 | 82.7% | 53.6% | — |
| 2010 |
HOU
|
75 | 34.2 | 13.5 | 4.1 | 6.7 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 4.6 | 10.8 | 42.6% | 1.7 | 4.6 | 37.6% | 2.6 | 3.3 | 76.5% | 55.0% | — |
| 2011 |
HOU
|
47 | 32.1 | 14.3 | 4.5 | 6.6 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 4.5 | 10.9 | 40.9% | 1.7 | 4.5 | 37.4% | 3.6 | 4.2 | 86.4% | 55.8% | — |
| 2012 |
TOR
|
68 | 29.7 | 11.6 | 4.7 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 3.7 | 9.2 | 40.1% | 1.5 | 4.1 | 36.2% | 2.8 | 3.5 | 79.5% | 54.3% | — |
| 2013 |
TOR
|
79 | 36.2 | 17.9 | 4.7 | 7.4 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 3.4 | 5.8 | 13.7 | 42.3% | 2.4 | 6.3 | 38.0% | 4.0 | 4.9 | 81.3% | 56.7% | — |
| 2014 |
TOR
|
70 | 34.5 | 17.8 | 4.7 | 6.8 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 6.1 | 14.9 | 41.2% | 1.9 | 5.6 | 33.8% | 3.6 | 4.5 | 80.8% | 52.7% | — |
| 2015 |
TOR
|
77 | 37.0 | 21.2 | 4.7 | 6.4 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 6.6 | 15.6 | 42.7% | 2.8 | 7.1 | 38.8% | 5.2 | 6.4 | 81.1% | 57.8% | — |
| 2016 |
TOR
|
60 | 37.4 | 22.4 | 4.8 | 7.0 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 7.1 | 15.3 | 46.4% | 3.2 | 7.8 | 41.2% | 5.0 | 6.1 | 81.9% | 62.3% | — |
| 2017 |
TOR
|
78 | 32.2 | 16.2 | 5.6 | 6.9 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 12.1 | 42.7% | 3.1 | 7.6 | 39.9% | 2.9 | 3.3 | 85.4% | 59.8% | — |
| 2018 |
TOR
|
65 | 34.0 | 14.2 | 4.8 | 8.7 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 4.7 | 11.4 | 41.1% | 2.4 | 7.0 | 34.7% | 2.5 | 3.0 | 83.0% | 56.2% | — |
| 2019 |
TOR
|
58 | 36.3 | 19.4 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 5.8 | 13.8 | 41.6% | 2.8 | 8.0 | 35.2% | 5.1 | 5.9 | 85.7% | 59.0% | — |
| 2020 |
TOR
|
46 | 34.9 | 17.2 | 5.4 | 7.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 5.7 | 13.0 | 43.6% | 2.8 | 7.2 | 39.6% | 3.0 | 3.5 | 87.5% | 59.3% | — |
| 2021 |
MIA
|
63 | 33.8 | 13.4 | 4.5 | 7.5 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 4.4 | 10.0 | 44.0% | 2.3 | 6.1 | 37.7% | 2.3 | 2.8 | 85.1% | 60.0% | — |
| 2022 |
MIA
|
57 | 31.1 | 11.5 | 4.1 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 3.7 | 8.9 | 41.3% | 2.0 | 5.6 | 35.4% | 2.1 | 2.5 | 86.4% | 57.5% | — |
| 2023 |
MIA
|
37 | 28.1 | 8.2 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 6.5 | 42.6% | 1.7 | 4.4 | 38.5% | 0.9 | 1.1 | 83.3% | 58.2% | — |
| 2023 |
PHI
|
24 | 28.3 | 8.0 | 2.9 | 4.5 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 6.0 | 43.4% | 1.5 | 3.9 | 39.4% | 1.2 | 1.4 | 84.8% | 59.9% | — |
| 2023 |
TOT
|
61 | 28.2 | 8.1 | 3.3 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 6.3 | 42.9% | 1.6 | 4.2 | 38.8% | 1.0 | 1.2 | 84.0% | 58.8% | — |
| 2024 |
PHI
|
35 | 18.9 | 3.9 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 3.3 | 35.0% | 0.8 | 2.5 | 33.0% | 0.8 | 0.9 | 81.8% | 52.5% | — |
| 2025 |
PHI
|
8 | 8.9 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 25.0% | 0.4 | 1.5 | 25.0% | 0.6 | 0.8 | 83.3% | 47.8% | — |
🧊 Playoffs? Never heard of ’emThis player hasn’t made the postseason yet. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Progression
Select Stats for Chart
Play Type Usage (Poss Freq%)
Play Type
Possession Outcomes
Shooting Volume & Efficiency
Hexbin Chart (eFG%)
Less
More
Cold
Hot
Zone Breakdown
Detailed Metrics
RIM
0 FGA
0.0%
2TH %ILE
PAINT
0 FGA
0.0%
8TH %ILE
MIDRANGE
0 FGA
0.0%
20TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (L)
6 FGA
100.0%
100TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (R)
6 FGA
0.0%
21TH %ILE
ABOVE BREAK 3
84 FGA
20.0%
20TH %ILE
Trades
Rumors and transaction history will appear here.
Stat
What it means
Formula
League context
League avg
—