Doug McDermott
Team
Sacramento Kings
Pos
F
No.
7
HT
6-7
WT
225
Age
34
(Jan 3, 1992)
College
Creighton
Draft
2014 (R1 P11)
Season Snapshot
2025
3.9
0.7
0.3
57%
With Teammate
0 Mins
Without Teammate
0 Mins
Most Impactful Pairings
McDermott
McDermott
Stat Impact
Core
Shooting
Defense & Discipline
Scoring Counts
Assisted vs Unassisted
Shot Diet & Point Mix
Playmaking
Touches & Passing Volume
Shot Quality
Defensive Playmaking
Contests
Matchups
Defense by Distance
Rebounding
Hustle Plays
Movement
Compare this player
Stat basis
Player season
Compare season
Doug McDermott
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Search for a player above to begin.
Share this chart with anyone who needs to lose an argument.
Doug McDermott
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Pick a comparison player to generate the biased list.
Polls
Log in to vote.
No active polls right now.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to start the discussion.
Loading more…
Page 1 / 1
Saved.
Financial Summary: Doug McDermott
TOTAL VALUE
$2.3M
AVG. ANNUAL (AAV)
$2.3M
| Season | Team | Base Salary | Cap Hit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | SAC | $2,296,274 | $2,296,274 |
| 2026-27 | SAC | UFA | |
All Lineup Combinations
Career Statistics
| Season | Team | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 |
CHI
|
35 | 9.2 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 3.1 | 40.2% | 0.4 | 1.2 | 31.7% | 0.3 | 0.4 | 66.7% | 48.0% | — |
| 2015 |
CHI
|
81 | 23.0 | 9.4 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 8.0 | 45.2% | 1.4 | 3.2 | 42.5% | 0.9 | 1.0 | 85.7% | 56.1% | — |
| 2016 |
OKC
|
22 | 19.6 | 6.6 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 5.6 | 45.2% | 1.0 | 2.6 | 36.2% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 70.6% | 55.1% | — |
| 2016 |
CHI
|
44 | 24.5 | 10.2 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 8.5 | 44.5% | 1.3 | 3.4 | 37.3% | 1.3 | 1.5 | 88.1% | 55.5% | — |
| 2016 |
TOT
|
66 | 22.8 | 9.0 | 2.7 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 7.5 | 44.7% | 1.2 | 3.2 | 37.0% | 1.1 | 1.3 | 84.5% | 55.4% | — |
| 2017 |
DAL
|
26 | 22.9 | 9.0 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 3.3 | 6.9 | 47.8% | 1.5 | 3.0 | 49.4% | 0.9 | 1.1 | 85.7% | 61.1% | — |
| 2017 |
NYK
|
55 | 21.3 | 7.2 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 6.0 | 46.0% | 1.0 | 2.5 | 38.7% | 0.7 | 1.0 | 75.5% | 56.2% | — |
| 2017 |
TOT
|
81 | 21.8 | 7.8 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 2.9 | 6.3 | 46.7% | 1.1 | 2.7 | 42.6% | 0.8 | 1.0 | 79.0% | 57.9% | — |
| 2018 |
IND
|
77 | 17.4 | 7.3 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 5.5 | 49.1% | 1.1 | 2.7 | 40.8% | 0.9 | 1.0 | 83.5% | 61.7% | — |
| 2019 |
IND
|
69 | 19.9 | 10.3 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 3.9 | 7.9 | 48.8% | 1.9 | 4.3 | 43.5% | 0.7 | 0.8 | 82.8% | 62.0% | — |
| 2020 |
IND
|
66 | 24.5 | 13.6 | 3.4 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 5.4 | 10.1 | 53.2% | 1.7 | 4.3 | 38.8% | 1.2 | 1.5 | 81.6% | 63.5% | — |
| 2021 |
SAS
|
51 | 24.0 | 11.3 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 4.2 | 9.1 | 46.2% | 2.1 | 5.0 | 42.2% | 0.8 | 1.0 | 78.4% | 59.3% | — |
| 2022 |
SAS
|
64 | 20.5 | 10.2 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 8.2 | 45.7% | 1.9 | 4.7 | 41.3% | 0.8 | 1.1 | 75.7% | 59.0% | — |
| 2023 |
IND
|
18 | 11.3 | 4.2 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 3.8 | 40.6% | 1.0 | 3.1 | 32.1% | 0.1 | 0.1 | 50.0% | 53.7% | — |
| 2023 |
SAS
|
46 | 15.3 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 4.7 | 44.2% | 1.7 | 3.8 | 43.9% | 0.2 | 0.4 | 58.8% | 62.0% | — |
| 2023 |
TOT
|
64 | 14.1 | 5.5 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 4.4 | 43.3% | 1.5 | 3.6 | 41.0% | 0.2 | 0.3 | 57.9% | 60.0% | — |
| 2024 |
SAC
|
43 | 8.1 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 42.0% | 1.0 | 2.4 | 42.7% | 0.1 | 0.1 | 60.0% | 60.6% | — |
| 2025 |
SAC
|
15 | 10.2 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 38.0% | 1.2 | 3.2 | 37.5% | 0.1 | 0.1 | 100.0% | 57.0% | — |
🧊 Playoffs? Never heard of ’emThis player hasn’t made the postseason yet. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Progression
Select Stats for Chart
Play Type Usage (Poss Freq%)
Play Type
Possession Outcomes
Shooting Volume & Efficiency
Hexbin Chart (eFG%)
Less
More
Cold
Hot
Zone Breakdown
Detailed Metrics
RIM
6 FGA
100.0%
97TH %ILE
PAINT
6 FGA
0.0%
-1TH %ILE
MIDRANGE
0 FGA
0.0%
0TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (L)
53 FGA
50.0%
83TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (R)
20 FGA
100.0%
98TH %ILE
ABOVE BREAK 3
140 FGA
31.0%
42TH %ILE
Trades
Rumors and transaction history will appear here.
Stat
What it means
Formula
League context
League avg
—