Jusuf Nurkic
Team
Utah Jazz
Pos
C
No.
30
HT
6-11
WT
290
College
Cedevita
Draft
2014 (R1 P16)
Season Snapshot
2025
10.9
10.4
4.8
55%
With Teammate
0 Mins
Without Teammate
0 Mins
Most Impactful Pairings
Nurkic
Nurkic
Stat Impact
Core
Shooting
Defense & Discipline
Scoring Counts
Assisted vs Unassisted
Shot Diet & Point Mix
Playmaking
Touches & Passing Volume
Shot Quality
Defensive Playmaking
Contests
Matchups
Defense by Distance
Rebounding
Hustle Plays
Movement
Compare this player
Stat basis
Player season
Compare season
Jusuf Nurkic
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Search for a player above to begin.
Share this chart with anyone who needs to lose an argument.
Jusuf Nurkic
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Pick a comparison player to generate the biased list.
Polls
Log in to vote.
No active polls right now.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to start the discussion.
Loading more…
Page 1 / 1
Saved.
Financial Summary: Jusuf Nurkic
TOTAL VALUE
$19.4M
AVG. ANNUAL (AAV)
$19.4M
| Season | Team | Base Salary | Cap Hit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | UTA | $19,375,000 | $19,375,000 |
| 2026-27 | UTA | UFA | |
All Lineup Combinations
Career Statistics
| Season | Team | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 |
DEN
|
62 | 17.8 | 6.9 | 6.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 6.2 | 44.6% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 1.4 | 2.1 | 63.6% | 48.3% | — |
| 2015 |
DEN
|
32 | 17.1 | 8.2 | 5.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 7.6 | 41.7% | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 1.9 | 3.1 | 61.6% | 46.0% | — |
| 2016 |
POR
|
20 | 29.2 | 15.2 | 10.3 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 6.0 | 11.8 | 50.8% | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 3.2 | 4.8 | 66.0% | 54.5% | — |
| 2016 |
DEN
|
45 | 17.9 | 8.0 | 5.8 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 6.6 | 50.7% | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 1.2 | 2.5 | 49.6% | 51.5% | — |
| 2016 |
TOT
|
65 | 21.4 | 10.2 | 7.2 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 4.2 | 8.2 | 50.7% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 1.8 | 3.2 | 57.1% | 52.8% | — |
| 2017 |
POR
|
79 | 26.4 | 14.3 | 9.0 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 3.1 | 6.1 | 12.0 | 50.5% | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 2.2 | 3.5 | 63.0% | 52.8% | — |
| 2018 |
POR
|
72 | 27.4 | 15.6 | 10.4 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 5.8 | 11.5 | 50.8% | 0.0 | 0.4 | 10.3% | 3.9 | 5.1 | 77.3% | 57.0% | — |
| 2019 |
POR
|
8 | 31.6 | 17.6 | 10.2 | 4.0 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 4.9 | 6.8 | 13.6 | 49.5% | 0.2 | 1.2 | 20.0% | 3.9 | 4.4 | 88.6% | 56.7% | — |
| 2020 |
POR
|
37 | 23.8 | 11.5 | 9.0 | 3.4 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 4.6 | 9.0 | 51.4% | 0.3 | 0.8 | 40.0% | 1.9 | 3.1 | 61.9% | 55.4% | — |
| 2021 |
POR
|
56 | 28.2 | 15.0 | 11.1 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 2.5 | 3.4 | 5.7 | 10.7 | 53.5% | 0.3 | 1.0 | 26.8% | 3.3 | 4.8 | 69.0% | 58.6% | — |
| 2022 |
POR
|
52 | 26.8 | 13.3 | 9.1 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 3.6 | 5.0 | 9.7 | 51.9% | 0.8 | 2.3 | 36.1% | 2.4 | 3.7 | 66.1% | 58.9% | — |
| 2023 |
PHX
|
76 | 27.3 | 10.9 | 11.0 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 3.3 | 4.2 | 8.2 | 51.0% | 0.3 | 1.2 | 24.4% | 2.2 | 3.4 | 64.0% | 55.9% | — |
| 2024 |
PHX
|
25 | 23.6 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 6.5 | 45.4% | 0.8 | 2.4 | 32.2% | 1.9 | 2.8 | 69.6% | 55.6% | — |
| 2024 |
CHA
|
26 | 18.1 | 9.2 | 6.5 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 3.6 | 7.3 | 49.7% | 0.5 | 1.8 | 28.3% | 1.4 | 2.3 | 62.7% | 55.4% | — |
| 2024 |
TOT
|
51 | 20.8 | 8.9 | 7.8 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 6.9 | 47.7% | 0.6 | 2.1 | 30.5% | 1.7 | 2.5 | 66.4% | 55.5% | — |
| 2025 |
UTA
|
41 | 26.4 | 10.9 | 10.4 | 4.8 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 4.4 | 8.7 | 50.3% | 0.6 | 1.7 | 35.2% | 1.5 | 2.8 | 54.9% | 54.8% | — |
🧊 Playoffs? Never heard of ’emThis player hasn’t made the postseason yet. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Progression
Select Stats for Chart
Play Type Usage (Poss Freq%)
Play Type
Possession Outcomes
Shooting Volume & Efficiency
Hexbin Chart (eFG%)
Less
More
Cold
Hot
Zone Breakdown
Detailed Metrics
RIM
208 FGA
58.3%
25TH %ILE
PAINT
221 FGA
52.9%
86TH %ILE
MIDRANGE
26 FGA
26.7%
36TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (L)
6 FGA
50.0%
88TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (R)
0 FGA
0.0%
23TH %ILE
ABOVE BREAK 3
104 FGA
34.3%
59TH %ILE
Trades
Rumors and transaction history will appear here.
Stat
What it means
Formula
League context
League avg
—