Dennis Schroder
Team
Cleveland Cavaliers
Pos
G
No.
17
HT
6-1
WT
175
College
Braunschweig
Draft
2013 (R1 P17)
Season Snapshot
2025
12.8
3.1
5.3
53%
With Teammate
0 Mins
Without Teammate
0 Mins
Most Impactful Pairings
Schroder
Schroder
Stat Impact
Core
Shooting
Defense & Discipline
Scoring Counts
Assisted vs Unassisted
Shot Diet & Point Mix
Playmaking
Touches & Passing Volume
Shot Quality
Defensive Playmaking
Contests
Matchups
Defense by Distance
Rebounding
Hustle Plays
Movement
Compare this player
Stat basis
Player season
Compare season
Dennis Schroder
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Search for a player above to begin.
Share this chart with anyone who needs to lose an argument.
Dennis Schroder
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Pick a comparison player to generate the biased list.
Polls
Log in to vote.
No active polls right now.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to start the discussion.
Loading more…
Page 1 / 1
Saved.
Financial Summary: Dennis Schroder
TOTAL VALUE
—
AVG. ANNUAL (AAV)
—
| Season | Team | Base Salary | Cap Hit |
|---|
All Lineup Combinations
Career Statistics
| Season | Team | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 |
ATL
|
77 | 19.7 | 10.0 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 3.7 | 8.6 | 42.7% | 0.7 | 1.9 | 35.1% | 1.9 | 2.3 | 82.7% | 51.6% | — |
| 2015 |
ATL
|
80 | 20.3 | 11.0 | 2.5 | 4.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 4.1 | 9.8 | 42.1% | 1.0 | 3.0 | 32.2% | 1.8 | 2.3 | 79.1% | 51.0% | — |
| 2016 |
ATL
|
79 | 31.4 | 17.9 | 3.1 | 6.3 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 3.3 | 1.9 | 6.9 | 15.4 | 45.1% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 34.0% | 2.8 | 3.2 | 85.5% | 53.3% | — |
| 2017 |
ATL
|
67 | 31.0 | 19.4 | 3.1 | 6.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 7.5 | 17.1 | 43.6% | 1.1 | 3.9 | 29.0% | 3.4 | 4.0 | 84.9% | 51.5% | — |
| 2018 |
OKC
|
79 | 29.3 | 15.5 | 3.6 | 4.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 5.8 | 14.0 | 41.4% | 1.6 | 4.6 | 34.1% | 2.4 | 2.9 | 81.9% | 50.8% | — |
| 2019 |
OKC
|
65 | 30.7 | 18.9 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 7.0 | 14.8 | 46.9% | 1.9 | 5.0 | 38.5% | 3.0 | 3.6 | 83.9% | 57.5% | — |
| 2020 |
LAL
|
61 | 32.1 | 15.4 | 3.5 | 5.8 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 5.4 | 12.5 | 43.7% | 1.2 | 3.5 | 33.5% | 3.4 | 4.0 | 84.8% | 54.3% | — |
| 2021 |
HOU
|
15 | 27.0 | 10.9 | 3.3 | 5.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 3.7 | 9.3 | 39.3% | 1.3 | 3.9 | 32.8% | 2.3 | 2.6 | 87.2% | 51.9% | — |
| 2021 |
BOS
|
49 | 29.2 | 14.4 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 11.9 | 44.0% | 1.4 | 3.9 | 34.9% | 2.5 | 3.0 | 84.8% | 54.3% | — |
| 2021 |
TOT
|
64 | 28.7 | 13.6 | 3.3 | 4.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 4.9 | 11.3 | 43.1% | 1.3 | 3.9 | 34.4% | 2.5 | 2.9 | 85.3% | 53.9% | — |
| 2022 |
LAL
|
67 | 30.1 | 12.7 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 4.1 | 9.9 | 41.5% | 1.1 | 3.4 | 33.6% | 3.3 | 3.9 | 86.2% | 54.8% | — |
| 2023 |
TOR
|
51 | 30.6 | 13.7 | 2.8 | 6.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 4.8 | 11.0 | 44.2% | 1.5 | 4.3 | 35.0% | 2.5 | 2.9 | 85.2% | 55.9% | — |
| 2023 |
BKN
|
29 | 32.0 | 14.6 | 3.5 | 6.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 5.4 | 12.7 | 42.4% | 2.1 | 5.1 | 41.2% | 1.8 | 2.2 | 79.7% | 53.5% | — |
| 2023 |
TOT
|
80 | 31.1 | 14.0 | 3.0 | 6.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 11.6 | 43.5% | 1.7 | 4.6 | 37.5% | 2.2 | 2.7 | 83.6% | 55.0% | — |
| 2024 |
DET
|
28 | 25.2 | 10.8 | 2.6 | 5.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 9.0 | 37.8% | 1.1 | 3.8 | 30.2% | 2.9 | 3.4 | 83.3% | 51.5% | — |
| 2024 |
GSW
|
24 | 26.3 | 10.6 | 2.3 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 3.9 | 10.5 | 37.5% | 1.5 | 4.8 | 32.2% | 1.2 | 1.6 | 74.4% | 47.4% | — |
| 2024 |
BKN
|
23 | 33.5 | 18.4 | 3.0 | 6.6 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 6.4 | 14.1 | 45.2% | 2.5 | 6.5 | 38.7% | 3.1 | 3.5 | 88.9% | 58.8% | — |
| 2024 |
TOT
|
75 | 28.1 | 13.1 | 2.6 | 5.4 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 4.5 | 11.0 | 40.6% | 1.7 | 4.9 | 34.2% | 2.4 | 2.9 | 83.8% | 53.1% | — |
| 2025 |
CLE
|
14 | 23.6 | 9.6 | 2.2 | 4.4 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 8.1 | 39.5% | 0.8 | 2.6 | 30.6% | 2.4 | 2.8 | 87.2% | 51.5% | — |
| 2025 |
SAC
|
40 | 26.3 | 12.8 | 3.0 | 5.3 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 4.3 | 10.6 | 40.8% | 1.4 | 4.2 | 34.3% | 2.7 | 3.3 | 82.0% | 53.1% | — |
| 2025 |
TOT
|
54 | 25.6 | 11.9 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 9.9 | 40.5% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 33.7% | 2.6 | 3.2 | 83.1% | 52.7% | — |
🧊 Playoffs? Never heard of ’emThis player hasn’t made the postseason yet. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Progression
Select Stats for Chart
Play Type Usage (Poss Freq%)
Play Type
Possession Outcomes
Shooting Volume & Efficiency
Hexbin Chart (eFG%)
Less
More
Cold
Hot
Zone Breakdown
Detailed Metrics
RIM
117 FGA
57.6%
23TH %ILE
PAINT
156 FGA
39.7%
44TH %ILE
MIDRANGE
123 FGA
38.5%
56TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (L)
32 FGA
48.0%
81TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (R)
13 FGA
25.0%
33TH %ILE
ABOVE BREAK 3
201 FGA
32.0%
47TH %ILE
Trades
Rumors and transaction history will appear here.
Stat
What it means
Formula
League context
League avg
—