Garrett Temple
Team
Toronto Raptors
Pos
G-F
No.
17
HT
6-5
WT
195
Age
39
(May 8, 1986)
College
Louisiana State
Season Snapshot
2025
0.5
0.3
0.3
33%
With Teammate
0 Mins
Without Teammate
0 Mins
Most Impactful Pairings
Temple
Temple
Stat Impact
Core
Shooting
Defense & Discipline
Scoring Counts
Assisted vs Unassisted
Shot Diet & Point Mix
Playmaking
Touches & Passing Volume
Shot Quality
Defensive Playmaking
Contests
Matchups
Defense by Distance
Rebounding
Hustle Plays
Movement
Compare this player
Stat basis
Player season
Compare season
Garrett Temple
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Search for a player above to begin.
Share this chart with anyone who needs to lose an argument.
Garrett Temple
—
VS
Pick a player
—
Pick a comparison player to generate the biased list.
Polls
Log in to vote.
No active polls right now.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to start the discussion.
Loading more…
Page 1 / 1
Saved.
Financial Summary: Garrett Temple
TOTAL VALUE
$2.3M
AVG. ANNUAL (AAV)
$2.3M
| Season | Team | Base Salary | Cap Hit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | TOR | $2,296,274 | $2,296,274 |
| 2026-27 | TOR | UFA | |
All Lineup Combinations
Career Statistics
| Season | Team | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 |
SAS
|
13 | 14.8 | 6.2 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 4.9 | 43.8% | 0.8 | 1.8 | 43.5% | 1.1 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 54.6% | — |
| 2009 |
HOU
|
9 | 13.3 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 3.2 | 44.8% | 0.3 | 1.3 | 25.0% | 1.8 | 2.7 | 66.7% | 56.9% | — |
| 2009 |
SAC
|
4 | 5.5 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 37.5% | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0% | 1.2 | 1.2 | 100.0% | 53.9% | — |
| 2009 |
TOT
|
26 | 12.8 | 5.2 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 3.9 | 43.6% | 0.5 | 1.4 | 35.1% | 1.3 | 1.9 | 70.0% | 55.3% | — |
| 2010 |
MIL
|
9 | 9.2 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 33.3% | 0.3 | 1.1 | 30.0% | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0% | 37.3% | — |
| 2010 |
CHA
|
12 | 10.5 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 28.6% | 0.6 | 2.2 | 26.9% | 0.6 | 0.9 | 63.6% | 40.6% | — |
| 2010 |
SAS
|
3 | 6.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 20.0% | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0% | 17.0% | — |
| 2010 |
TOT
|
24 | 9.5 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 29.4% | 0.4 | 1.5 | 27.0% | 0.3 | 0.7 | 41.2% | 37.8% | — |
| 2012 |
WAS
|
50 | 23.2 | 5.2 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 5.2 | 40.7% | 0.5 | 1.6 | 32.5% | 0.5 | 0.7 | 70.3% | 47.8% | — |
| 2013 |
WAS
|
65 | 9.7 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 36.2% | 0.1 | 0.4 | 20.7% | 0.5 | 0.7 | 69.8% | 43.1% | — |
| 2014 |
WAS
|
51 | 14.4 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 40.0% | 0.6 | 1.7 | 37.5% | 0.7 | 0.9 | 72.9% | 53.4% | — |
| 2015 |
WAS
|
80 | 24.4 | 7.3 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 6.3 | 39.8% | 1.1 | 3.2 | 34.5% | 1.1 | 1.6 | 72.8% | 52.0% | — |
| 2016 |
SAC
|
65 | 26.6 | 7.8 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 6.6 | 42.4% | 1.3 | 3.4 | 37.3% | 0.9 | 1.1 | 78.4% | 54.5% | — |
| 2017 |
SAC
|
65 | 24.9 | 8.4 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 7.3 | 41.8% | 1.4 | 3.5 | 39.2% | 0.9 | 1.2 | 76.9% | 53.6% | — |
| 2018 |
MEM
|
49 | 31.2 | 9.4 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 7.9 | 42.9% | 1.5 | 4.3 | 35.2% | 1.2 | 1.6 | 75.0% | 55.1% | — |
| 2018 |
LAC
|
26 | 19.7 | 4.7 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 4.1 | 39.6% | 0.6 | 2.1 | 29.6% | 0.9 | 1.2 | 74.2% | 51.4% | — |
| 2018 |
TOT
|
75 | 27.2 | 7.8 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 6.6 | 42.2% | 1.2 | 3.5 | 34.1% | 1.1 | 1.4 | 74.8% | 54.3% | — |
| 2019 |
BKN
|
62 | 27.9 | 10.3 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 3.6 | 9.5 | 37.8% | 2.0 | 6.2 | 32.9% | 1.1 | 1.4 | 80.5% | 51.3% | — |
| 2020 |
CHI
|
56 | 27.3 | 7.5 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 6.8 | 41.5% | 1.2 | 3.6 | 33.5% | 0.7 | 0.9 | 80.0% | 52.5% | — |
| 2021 |
NOP
|
59 | 18.6 | 5.2 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 5.0 | 37.6% | 1.0 | 3.1 | 31.9% | 0.5 | 0.7 | 68.3% | 49.4% | — |
| 2022 |
NOP
|
25 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 40.0% | 0.4 | 1.0 | 42.3% | 0.1 | 0.2 | 75.0% | 53.5% | — |
| 2023 |
TOR
|
27 | 10.7 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 2.9 | 37.2% | 0.4 | 1.5 | 30.0% | 0.7 | 0.8 | 81.8% | 50.2% | — |
| 2024 |
TOR
|
27 | 8.4 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 30.0% | 0.2 | 1.0 | 21.4% | 0.4 | 0.4 | 91.7% | 40.6% | — |
| 2025 |
TOR
|
15 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 12.5% | 0.1 | 0.4 | 16.7% | 0.3 | 0.4 | 66.7% | 32.9% | — |
🧊 Playoffs? Never heard of ’emThis player hasn’t made the postseason yet. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Progression
Select Stats for Chart
Play Type Usage (Poss Freq%)
Play Type
Possession Outcomes
Shooting Volume & Efficiency
Hexbin Chart (eFG%)
Less
More
Cold
Hot
Zone Breakdown
Detailed Metrics
RIM
0 FGA
0.0%
2TH %ILE
PAINT
12 FGA
0.0%
8TH %ILE
MIDRANGE
0 FGA
0.0%
21TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (L)
18 FGA
0.0%
22TH %ILE
CORNER 3 (R)
0 FGA
0.0%
22TH %ILE
ABOVE BREAK 3
25 FGA
20.0%
21TH %ILE
Trades
Rumors and transaction history will appear here.
Stat
What it means
Formula
League context
League avg
—